That is in fact 120 per minute.6 times faster then your method. I browse through sample libaries at a rate of two per seccond. What also bothers me is that you are a betatester, is that just a title in this forum or are you actually testing the products? If the latter is true then why don’t you back me up on this one? Every tester would come up with this short coming.Īnd lastly your workaround? 20 samples per minute? I am shure that if the first EZ drummer had so many samples as EZX electronics it was constructed differently. computers are really fast and we want to work fast.Īnd every serious sample player accomodate such a feature for browsing fast through the content. It would mean a lot of programming to do. If that is true it’s totally understandable where the culprit lies.
I am not a programmer but I think that to audition a sample it must be loaded first into the construct page, cause the program doesn’t have a dedicated audition player. With EZX electronics it’s the first time that one pad contains numerous samples that even can’t be displayed in one screen.
It’s very clear that all previous products from Toontrack didn’t need a dedicated sample browser so the developers didn’t feel the need to construct one. Did you really think I didn’t know how to work my way around a DAW?
0 kommentar(er)
